Heres A Warped Question For You...
 

Lets say, that you had a choice between these 2 types of vehicles to fight in on the eastern front, only one of which you could fight from for the whole war, which would you pick. keep in mind that you never know what distances youd be fighting at, sometimes long, sometimes shorter distances.

a) a F model Stug {no MG, 75mm/L48}

or

B) a Nashorn {has mg*, 88mm/L70}

* just because combat mission says it doesnt have one, doesnt mean it didnt. each nashorn was issued a mg-34lmg and 1200 rnds of ammo as standard kit. it also was a standard practice in the fieldshops to "jerry rig" them {haha get the pun} with AAMG mounts on the shield/armor. if the enemy did close the range to where the mg was needed, the crew fought with thier mg-34 up over the shield or from one of the AA mounts and the rest used thier mp-40's.

Gents,

STUG hands down, Its not vulnerable to plunging fire,

except of course, heavy shells, and any tank is reliant on the

landsers for protection. My 2 cents........

Swamp

No doubts for me, I want the Stug.
Better armor,lower profile, capable gun.

Stug -- the Nashorn is a death trap. Heaven help you if you ever have to drive that thing into a city like Kharkov -- molotov central.

I'll really on my infantry buddies and my trusty sidearms to keep the Russkie infantry off my vehicle.

If you could spend the whole war with only one woman in your tank and you were Brad Pitt, who would it be, Angelina Jolie or Jennifer Aniston?

Angelina =) not only is she "better armored" than Jen
Angelina could take the abuse of a "Long Hard Campaign"
where Jen would need too much maintenance :twisted:

Jen.....

I've been fixing high preformance machines all my life, And you can bet I'd check her oil on a regular basis

Swamp

Angelina hands down! :twisted:

i like a woman who knows "iron". id definately go with Angelina.

Can you say,........"sassy" :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

http://www.kettering.edu/~lavr7588/Angelina_Jolie.jpg