Go Back   Kampfgruppe Forums > Military History > World War II > War in the Air

 
We are happy to announce open registration on the KG forums has begun! Welcome everyone!

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 07-26-2007, 03:22 PM
Palantir's Avatar
Palantir Palantir is offline
Feldwebel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 701
Default Take off & landing length?

Can anyone tell me what was the take off & landing length needed for a Junkers 52 & 88?

Must be some big national secret I can't find it...

Thanks!
__________________
"All that is gold does not glitter"

"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it." -- Barrack Obama

''Life's tough.....it's even tougher if you're stupid.'' -- John Wayne
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 07-26-2007, 10:40 PM
KG_AirborneBob's Avatar
KG_AirborneBob KG_AirborneBob is offline
Fahnenjunker Unteroffizier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 502
Default

I searched here..but couldnt find your info...but some good stuff anyway...

http://www.junkers.de.vu/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 07-26-2007, 11:41 PM
KG_Panzerschreck's Avatar
KG_Panzerschreck KG_Panzerschreck is offline
Recruit. Off./ Global Mod
Generaloberst
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Williamsburg, Pa.
Posts: 3,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palantir View Post
Can anyone tell me what was the take off & landing length needed for a Junkers 52 & 88?

Must be some big national secret I can't find it...

Thanks!
Ask that question over at Axis History Forums and I'll bet you get a response in less than a day...
__________________
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd168/KG_Panzerschreck/557982_408582825918865_292225826_n1_zps9b264b91.jp  g
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 07-27-2007, 01:11 AM
KG_Jag's Avatar
KG_Jag KG_Jag is offline
Vice Kommandir
Generalfeldmarschall
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Braunfels, TX & Reno, NV
Posts: 3,762
Default

Kerry--none of the books I have available provide the answers to your questions. Kent's suggestion is probably the way the go.

If you care which type of Ju 88 for which you want your answer, I would recommend that you specify the version. A Ju 88 bomber could carry as much as a 2,000 kg of bombs if externally loaded. I suspect that it would need a much longer runway that say--the night fighter versions.
__________________
“A government big enough to give you everything you need is strong enough to take everything you have.” Thomas Jefferson--the first Democrat President
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 07-27-2007, 07:12 PM
Palantir's Avatar
Palantir Palantir is offline
Feldwebel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 701
Default

I was just needing basic info: 100m, 500m, 1000m, 2000m?

I've read reports of fighters using roads late in the war as runways, but doubt if that was done by the heavier & wider Junkers type.
__________________
"All that is gold does not glitter"

"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it." -- Barrack Obama

''Life's tough.....it's even tougher if you're stupid.'' -- John Wayne
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 07-27-2007, 07:38 PM
KG_Jag's Avatar
KG_Jag KG_Jag is offline
Vice Kommandir
Generalfeldmarschall
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Braunfels, TX & Reno, NV
Posts: 3,762
Default

So far what I have found is that for an Me 262: 900 to 1,000 yards of concrete runway was needed. A grass strip would require 1,100 to 1,400 yards of runway. See:

http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/Im...LOTDEBRIEF.pdf

Although about US domestic airfields, this might also give you an idea of the ballpark size of the runway:

http://www.airfields-freeman.com/CA/...ds_CA_LA_C.htm
__________________
“A government big enough to give you everything you need is strong enough to take everything you have.” Thomas Jefferson--the first Democrat President

Last edited by KG_Jag; 07-27-2007 at 07:47 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 07-28-2007, 04:43 PM
KG_Jag's Avatar
KG_Jag KG_Jag is offline
Vice Kommandir
Generalfeldmarschall
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Braunfels, TX & Reno, NV
Posts: 3,762
Default

I contacted Mike Shilton of the Luftwaffe Airfield Re-enactment Group out of the UK by email. Here's their site:

http://www.luftwaffeairfieldre-enact....uk/index.html

In about 1/2 a day Mike was kind enough to respond with the following information:

"Hello Bill,
from my references I have found that the Ju52 requires a take off run of 350m and the Ju88 the following:-
12.5 ton loaded weight = 570m
13.0 ton loaded weight = 650m
13.75 ton loaded weight - 750m

however if there are buildings in the vicinity of the runways end the take off runs are much longer, i.e for a 20m high building the figures are 1280m,1350m and 1420m respectively.

The runway lengths on airfields in general varied according to wether the landing area was grass or concrete and as to what the designers deemed suitable for the aircraft types likely to be operating from each airfield, HTh, Regards, mike."
__________________
“A government big enough to give you everything you need is strong enough to take everything you have.” Thomas Jefferson--the first Democrat President

Last edited by KG_Jag; 07-28-2007 at 05:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 07-29-2007, 05:26 PM
Palantir's Avatar
Palantir Palantir is offline
Feldwebel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 701
Default

WoW!

Thanks Bill & give my thanks to Mike! :)
__________________
"All that is gold does not glitter"

"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it." -- Barrack Obama

''Life's tough.....it's even tougher if you're stupid.'' -- John Wayne
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.